blah blah blah its obvious to those who will read our conversation who really believes in what he says and who dont... you talk, i walkOriginally Posted by Punisher136
I've said ONE thing about peter on this WHOLE thread and thats what your focusing on. I have yet to hear you defend any of his losses (especially the purity one, i want a GREAT explaination for that) I've said i'll own up to it if wlad wins this fight (you'll find that quote in a recent thread), if he doesn't you'll find some stamina excuse or find some "shady" knockdown that happened. Accepot the fact that the man has lost beofre and can be beaten again, its not out of the question. He's no Vitali...Originally Posted by Fire
blah blah blah i see ya talkin but i dont see ya walkinOriginally Posted by Punisher136
No because i'm not going around saying brewster is the reincarnation of jesus like some of you people are for wlad. I don't even like brewster. You need to accept that wlad has lost in the past and he's not as good as everyone pegs him to be. Wether he wins this fight or not, he still has LEGIT (and i emphasize that word) loses to sanders and brewster (regardless of what excuses you guys wanna make) and an unexcusable loss by any means to purity.Originally Posted by Fire
i see ya talking but i dont see ya walking...do u take the bet or notOriginally Posted by Punisher136
I'm not slamming wlad for having bad stamina, most people who want to try and make wlad's obvious losses disappear use it as an excuse for HIM. Using stamina as an excuse for wlad is way more ridiculous than using it for peter. Wlad was "gased" in round 5 (which is ridiculous for being the "next best thing") and lost to a journeyman. Go ahead and bring about the excuses that wlad was only 22, purity is still a jounreyman and there's no excuse for losing to him at any point in your career if you are indeed in line to become the next undisputed heavyweight champion of ANY era. I'm not a hater, someone needs to not be hugging Wlad's nuts on this forum.Originally Posted by Fire
i thought stamina was what people like slam klitchko for..now you are using it for an excuse for peterOriginally Posted by Punisher136
He hit the deck 4 times against sanders (and i don't wanna hear "He was exhausted" because that S*** happened in rd2) and more recently 3 times against peter. Most people will tell you if peter had some stamina, he would've won that fight by a landslide.Originally Posted by SalTheButcher
the fight wasnt close AT ALL, big vladdy DOMINATED brewster, that was back before big vladdy conserved his energy, he doesnt get tired anymore, and even when he took like 10 straight shots from brewster he didnt fall, it was exaustion that eventually put him downOriginally Posted by Dorfmeister
I find most amusing that people are looking for the next IBF heavyweight title mandatory challenger and call it Wlad's next mandatory when Klitschko faces Brewster tonight - is this some sort of bizarre prayer/spell so that Wlad comes out looking like he's the ruler in the Division? I mean, do you remember referee Robert Byrd carrying a 6 '6'' tall guy looking more like an earthquake survivor than a 240 pounds dominant hwt fighter not a very long time ago and against that same BrewsterNeedless to say I don't root for Wlad or for Lamon but this one seems to become much closer than what would transpire from this post...
wlad has and avg at worst chin... sanders, peter, and brewster could put ANY MAN on the mat... wlads knock downs had more to do with defense than having a weak chin..
most boxers who gets floored 3 times by his opponents and still wins is concidered to have a heart of a champion...but when wlad does that exact thing against peter it oh well (peter was tired,klicthko is overrated,) all that bullsh@t rather than YEAH HE TOOK SOME OF THE BEST SHOTS BY ONE OF THE HARDEST PUNCHERS TODAY AND STILL DOMINATED THE LATES ROUNDS.....
but haters hate its your job
hey punisher wanna bet turning your name to klitchko and I'll turn my name into whoever you decide?? if klitchko loses tonight.. since klitchko is so overrated...
this is a dangerous fight for klitchko tonight... i still think brewster is one of the most exciting HW's and a top 5 HW for sure...
Am i running around here saying "Brewster is gonna ko wlad in 30 seconds"? No. I've said (as you'll find me being cosnistant on in any thread you'll see) that brewster will (t)ko wlad late based on previous precedent that he has an exposable chin and he starts running out of steam in the late rounds. Yes he went into the 7th rounds of the borck and byrd fight without trouble but do brock and byrd have power or a pressure style? No.
i havent made ANY EXCUSES FOR WLAD YOU ARE THE ONE USING EXCUSES FOR PETER...
if you wont bet with brewster on your side... NAME ME ANY HW THAT YOU DO THINK WILL BEAT WLAD.... oh yeah you do think brewster will knock him out(talking) but you wont bet on it(walking).......... go ahead hide behind your words of hate....
if he is SO D@MN OVERRATED THEN BET ME....
if brewster dont beat Wlad no one can.... peter is his only other threat and klitch will beat his a$$ worst the second go round..
like i said if you liked a fighter and he got knocked down 3 times and got up and dominated the second half of the fight you would call it the "heart of a champions" material...
but since your a hater hate its your job...
here is my best explanation for wlad's dominance...
name me ONE FIGHTER that you would pick(strong enough were you would actually bet on it) that would beat the highly overrated klitchko...
truthfully i have heard the haters rail klitchko since before the sanders fight... i dont care what you say back it up....
d@mn you and dorf made my day by revealing that even the biggest klitchko haters dont really believe it(proof: not betting) you all just simply hate on him...
Bookmarks