Basically my point of this thread, asside from making you guys take another look at this fight and hopefully enjoy yourselves for a while watching this big event between two of our favorite fighters, is to say that the impression I get from some posts I have read is that many people feel DLH totally dominated Tito for 9 rounds. I think this is a big exageration. I did not get the impression whatching the fight that DLH ever dominated Tito. Oscar was outboxing him, yes, but Tito held his own, never lost composure and did enough to win some of those rounds and make most of them pretty close, even though he was being out boxed.
I think this was a damn close fight that could have gone either way and no one can complain that it was a robbery. Again, I say I wish it had been a draw.
I just think some people here put far too much enfasis on "boxers". Yes it is called boxing, yes it is about hit and not get hit. But some people take this WAY out of proportion. Like for example, those that actually think Spinks beat TaylorI mean the guy only landed 17% of his shots. This ofcourse is an exagerated example and I am by no means trying to do a comparison. What I am saying is that just because a guy is outboxing the other, it does not necesarily mean that he is clearly winning every round.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 

I mean the guy only landed 17% of his shots. This ofcourse is an exagerated example and I am by no means trying to do a comparison. What I am saying is that just because a guy is outboxing the other, it does not necesarily mean that he is clearly winning every round.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks