If you claim to understand the laws of thermodynamics what are they and how does evolution go against them? Coz i don't believe you.

Macro evolution does NOT claim that a plant will suddenly become an animal. It claims that it will specialize bit by bit to gradually become something different. You might want to read a little more about what the theory of macro evolution is before you bag it. Not what anti-evolution websites say it is!

Your cells are not carcinogenic until their DNA is altered by UV light or some other mutagen to suddenly change it's sequence in those particular cells. So YES new DNA sequences can occur that were not there before. They do NOT for the millionth time have to have always been there to exist.

I've been over that.

The fact that the theory of how specific species evolved over time is changing is not evidence against macro evolution. It's just evidence for the fact that scientists are working hard to uncover more about how individual species evolved. We're learning more about specific points in history which tell a story not that things didn't evolve at all. The basic concept that can occur has not been disproved.

If they were frauds as you suggested in your previous thread this would not happen. They'd stick to their original story very stubbornly despite all the evidence ........ rather like you.

Where is the meal you ate 3 weeks ago? Can you pin point the remnants of it exactly? and can you trace it to the sewer and identify the effluent that it became? Can you show you ate it? Can you tell exactly what it was? No but that doesn't mean that you didn't eat and have somehow miraculously survived without eating!

You probably could fish into your kitchen bin and show scraps of food you used to make your dinner. You probably could - if you were a plumber - trace your most recent effluent and tell the difference between that and cow shit.

There are fossils dating in between millions of years ago and the present time. You pulled that little statement out of nowhere!

You've also got to stop using the word random because you don't understand what is random and what is not. Reshuffling of homologous chromosomes is random, crossing over events are relatively random but less likely close to the sight of chromosome pairing. Mutagenic chemicals or UV light etc striking DNA and mutating it occurs because of environmental factors that are NOT random. A lot of mutations occur which are lethal or non-beneficial and do NOT get passed on. The fact that some do is NOT random it's because they are advantageous for survival in the environment in some way.

The basis of microevolution and mechanism is the same as for macroevolution. It's a bit hypocritical to say that you believe in microevolution but not macroevolution.

Now we have to technology to see that some evolution has occurred and because we can't trace every little step and you somehow irrationally believe it threatens your religious views you're bagging every scientist who ever worked in that field. Get over it!