Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock
there is nothing in that clip that would change my mind other wise..... Tyson would all over George like stink on shiit, for every one Foreman would land Tyson would snap off 2-3... Not to mention along with his chin his uppercutting was grossly UNDERRATED..

I never said Tyson was greater than Foreman or Frazier, just that it is an ideal matchup for Mike that would favor him OVERWHELMINGLY
Dude....the way Foreman fought Frazier would be a great way to beat Tyson.

People say what a phenom Tyson was but he had been boxing since he was like 13....George Foreman on the other hand learned to box, a year later he won the gold medal in Mexico City in 1968 and in 1973 he was undefeated undisputed heavyweight champion of the world.

Mike Tyson could even get to the Olympics, he needed 4 rounds to take out an OLD Larry Holmes and he never fought a GREAT fighter in his Prime.....Old Larry Holmes and Michael Spinks at heavyweight don't count as Michael Spinks was a great LIGHT heavyweight and Larry Holmes was great at the end of the 70's and start of the 80's.

Now Tyson was a Great fighter but he wasn't near what Foreman was....he KO'd people but not like Foreman.