Quote Originally Posted by miles
Quote Originally Posted by Klitschkofan
Quote Originally Posted by p4pking
Has Klitschko ever not been a betting favourite though? Probably not. Ill bet he was a big fav against Sanders and Brewster as well. He is a betting nightmare, when you factor in the chance that he will have a nervous breakdown.... I hope Byrd KOs the tin man and ends his career for real this time. He and Vitali can go model underwear some more.
Dude what is your problem with the Klitschko's?I really can't understand why someone wouldn't wan't to see either of them fight.Do you really find Byrd more fun to watch?
i do find chris byrd more fun to watch.

wlad, though technically sound is now somewhat boring for me. the peter fight showed limited variations on the jab and then clinch strategy. the most exciting points were when wlad had his hairy moments. the excitment didnt come from the offence of wlad whatsoever.

seeing chris byrd taking on the giants is much more appealing and the fact that he usually comes off the better only makes it more satisfying. a david and goliath kinda thing. byrds fights with tua and golota are absolutely riveting. byrds fight with big ike was also an edge of the seat encounter though of course byrd got hammered eventually and drooled a little. still, until that point he was competing and you couldnt fail to be entertained...

i prefer to watch byrd over wlad any day....
HAve you watched Wladimir's earlier fights?The fight with Peter was one of his most boring fights.He has the ability to outbox anyone and has the power to KO anyone, what is more entertaining than that?With Byrd you are almost asured of it going to the final bell, if I wanted to watch a boxing just for the scoring aspect I would watch featherweights because of their amazing speed.Wladimir has speed, power, and is currently the most technically gifted heavyweight out there.But if you really enjoy watching Byrd fight over Wladimir then that is your preference.