Quote Originally Posted by Lyle
1) David Tua's career choices.....that's what I am displeased with

2) The guys Tua has fought should consider themselves lucky to be called bums

3) Tua lost to Lennox in 2000....David is now 34 and times almost up. Why the dog fighting references od we really need those now?

4) By fighting Briggs he fights a former title holder who he can destroy easily...it's a simple quick fix way to help Tua reach contender status. A status I am not sure he really wants.

5) Oh Tyson knows it, Holyfield maybe not but he's no Big George....but you never know with the other heavyweight title holders out there.
1.It's understandable to be displeased with a fighter who showed such great potnetial (particularily at heavy,) but the guy doesn't deserve to be called a joke.
2.Again, and i find myself saying this over and over again. I feel the word bum in boxing is incredibly degrading and unfair, what if someone was calling you a bum for trying damn hard at ur job.
3.At 34 i no he's not a kid anymore but the longevity of heavies is far greater than say welters so i wouldn say hes outta time just yet....As for the dog references thats just what i associate with this situation, which i feel may be born out of desperation in the Tua camp.
4) Briggs may actually well fit the bill of the easy win to boost the confidence of tua, whilst also elevating him in the rankings but it's not exactly the most mouth watering prospect now is it?
5) Gotta lot of respect for Holyfield and a lot of sympathy for Tyson. Got my Fingers crossed for Holyfield Title shot.
6) Feel free to keep debatin wit me Lyle ur damn good!