Quote Originally Posted by brucelee
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by brucelee
Marquez vs Pacquaio. 3 knockdowns and still the former win by a draw.
Just because there was 3 knockdowns doesn't make it a robbery Marquez won more of the rounds i had Pac edging it but only just but controversy is with that one judge who didn't score the first round 10-6 because if he did Pac would of won.
It was robbery considering that they did not correct the judge's score after the judge admitted his error.
This has to be the worst inclusion. That was in no shape or form a robbery and justice was served by the making the error. JMM should have won that fight but it was close either way.


Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick
'Mantequilla' over 'El Hombre' I
That has got to be one of the worst. I mean the fight is stopped due to a cut on Napoles eye that was caused by a punch and the ref. stops the fight and then suddenly Jose Sulaiman (WBC President) the judges and the ref. all huddle up and decide to somehow god knows why award Napoles the win.

WTF?



Quote Originally Posted by 'Big' Dan McCarthy
All I can say is that the word "robbery" is over used in the sport of boxing. It no longer carries the weight that it should due to the fans voice being louder at times than it should be.
I totally agree but let me word it differently. There are far too many fans that think just because their favourite fighter lost,it was a robbery when in fact the fight was close. Far too many close fights are viewed as robberies nowadays when in actual fact,very few are.