Somw interesting ideas in there but I wander how workable some of them are.

I mean for example making a promoter liable if a fighter has been KO'd 3 times in 18 months. How does that work then, would it mean that such a fighter would have to retire? Or would have wait for a predetermined time period say 24 months before being allowed to box again?

And why should the promoter be liable in this case? Surely if a fighter is passed fit by a medical body then he's fit to fight no?

Also, and I appreciate the sport could do more to support fighters, but why is the onus always on promoters and governing bodies to make sure a fighter is insured in the event of an accident?

Can a boxer not take out private insurance? If I was a boxer I would even think of entering the ring unless I had insurance. Let's face it most of us wouldn't want to risk driving our cars without insurance irrespective of it being against the law, and I'm sure most of us have home insurance.

Shouldn't a fighter have insurance as well. I agree their promoters and managers should sort this for them but if not then surely a boxer should do it off their own back anyway just in case?