Quote Originally Posted by P.G.H Angel Eyes
And yet those who degraded Byrd and said his belt meant nothing, all and upgrade Wladimer for beating him comparing him to Ali etc. If you're going to downplay Chris and his title then don't give Credit to Klitschko for beating him. Stay consistant. If you had said Byrd was a great champion and given him credit then it could be legit to talk about the supremecy of Wladimer. But you downgraded Chris to make him seem the weakest of the Heavyweight champs. Then in your eyes Wladimer just beat the weakest champ. So why isn't this met with "so what." when instead it's met with "Wladimer is the best!" No consistancy or integrity in boxing anymore.
good arguments.

wlad beating byrd in such a convincing fashion has made his stock rise significantly with me but i suppose thats because i do respect and admire the fighter chris byrd is. wlad beat a very good fighter more convincingly than i thought he would....i want to see wlad: brewster 2 now. i think a wlad who can pace himself probably beats brewster now....