I don't know whats going to give me more pleasure, seeing Floyd embarrass Hatton or seeing all the excuses afterwards from Hatton's heartbroken fans.

Hatton's fans will point out that Hatton stopped guys who took Mayweather the distance. I SAY that is totally irrelevant considering the fact that Floyd is not really a knockout artist. Remember boxing is about winning, not necessarily about knocking a guy out.

I find it funny that the Hatton fans will point out this, but conveniently fail to mention how much trouble in his first and last trip to welterweight against Collazo, and how Collazo's movement gave Ricky grief. Collazo is no PBF.

I also find it hilarious that people slag PBF as a guy who beat up an "OLD MAN" in 34 year old DLH, but fail to slag Ricky Hatton for beating up a 36 year old Kosta Tsyzu, who had been plagued with serious shoulder and achilles tendon injuries in the years prior.

I'm trying to be argumentative. Arguing about who is going to win a fight that will happen in a few months is a fool's game IMO. Just wanted to point a few "convenient inconsistencies" that I've noticed in a lot of the Hatton nuthugger's arguments.