I understand where you are coming from with Pryor but then you'd have to do the same for everyone else. The thing is you gotta measure them all the same.Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Well to each is own, but I mean an arguement can be made for Tszyu and Cervantes.Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Well for his early fights I would say he was fighting fighters that up and comers fight.Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
When he beat Martinez for the title Martinez was no push over and Martinez was on a roll defending his title. Having just beat Herrera who had previously beaten him twice if memory serves me right. Not only did Zarate beat Martinez but he KO'd him and Zarate also went on to defend his title I think 9 times and all of those wins also came by KO and these guys were no longer cab drivers as you say these were World Class fighters. Somewhere in there you will find that he fought Alfonso Zamora who many people don't know was in reality a 'Unification' bout BUT the stupid WBC & WBA refused to acknowledge the showdown between these two but people knew who was the man in the Bantam div. once Zarate KO'd Zamora, he became the man there. He then moved up in weight to face Gomez who hit him while he was down and lost.
Well ICB, I agree with what your saying in someways but IMO, I always measure todays fighters by the old fighters and take it from there. Sometimes like in the case of let's say Pryor who do you measure him by?Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Pinky?
Perkins?
Benitez?
So I personally just look at all the champs that have campaigned there and take it from there.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks