Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 196

Thread: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2278
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

    Kevin Kelley manged to deck prince a number of times because of Balance problems, i think that pac's southpaw style and additional would result in prince being on the canvas more often and losing a wide UD due to 10-8 rds.
    091

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HARLEM
    Posts
    2,691
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1143
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

    Wonder what hindsight says now
    "Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones

  3. #3
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Wonder what hindsight says now
    Not much because the Featherweight version of Manny Pacquiao, was still very raw.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    19,539
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1906
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

    Pac would have battered Naz silly.

    FACT

  5. #5
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

    Quote Originally Posted by smashup View Post
    Pac would have battered Naz silly.

    FACT
    Your thinking way too much about the new and improved Manny Pacquiao, the Manny Pacquiao at Featherweight isn't the same animal. Although he was still very dangerous.

    He was a raw brawling fighter, who always come forward. And he was pretty one dimensional, i wouldn't be shocked with Naseem Hamed's power if he upset Manny Pacquiao.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    19,539
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1906
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by smashup View Post
    Pac would have battered Naz silly.

    FACT
    Your thinking way too much about the new and improved Manny Pacquiao, the Manny Pacquiao at Featherweight isn't the same animal. Although he was still very dangerous.

    He was a raw brawling fighter, who always come forward. And he was pretty one dimensional, i wouldn't be shocked with Naseem Hamed's power if he upset Manny Pacquiao.








    I think the only way Naz could possibly have upset him would be by blowing off during the stare down

  7. #7
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

    Quote Originally Posted by smashup View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by smashup View Post
    Pac would have battered Naz silly.

    FACT
    Your thinking way too much about the new and improved Manny Pacquiao, the Manny Pacquiao at Featherweight isn't the same animal. Although he was still very dangerous.

    He was a raw brawling fighter, who always come forward. And he was pretty one dimensional, i wouldn't be shocked with Naseem Hamed's power if he upset Manny Pacquiao.








    I think the only way Naz could possibly have upset him would be by blowing off during the stare down

    I just think the Manny Pacquiao at Featherweight is beatable, he was one dimensional. And he never boxed on the backfoot, he always come forward. And he was very hittable aswell.

    I really think that could spell disaster for Manny Pacquiao, because Naseem Hamed has unreal power. I mean only two men went the distance with him during his title reign, and they were the normally very durable Cesar Soto, and granite chinned Wayne McCullough.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    970
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

    Yes Pacquiao was pretty raw at that stage and could be stopped by Hamed, but a few things he had that Hamed never possessed or exhibit in the ring against an ATG, were mental toughness, a willingness to dig deep, and oh yeah something call having heart. The Barrera fight proved that Hamed for all his great physical gifts severely lacked these attributes that pushes a fighter into the upper echelon of all time great.That's why I'm going with Pacquiao for a win if there was a mythical matchup at 126.

    And if someone is going to bring up let's say the Kevin Kelly fight to try and say he possessed the intangibles I mentioned, people have to remember Kelly while a good fighter, was not an ATG fighter like a Barrera or a Pacquiao.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2474
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

    Pacman is a great fighter , who lost to morales and bounced back , fighting and beating the best.
    Hamed is a protected fighter with huge floors , poor defence , yes he has power , but that sit , Pacman is to fast for him and stops him inside 5.

  10. #10
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Yes Pacquiao was pretty raw at that stage and could be stopped by Hamed, but a few things he had that Hamed never possessed or exhibit in the ring against an ATG, were mental toughness, a willingness to dig deep, and oh yeah something call having heart. The Barrera fight proved that Hamed for all his great physical gifts severely lacked these attributes that pushes a fighter into the upper echelon of all time great.That's why I'm going with Pacquiao for a win if there was a mythical matchup at 126.

    And if someone is going to bring up let's say the Kevin Kelly fight to try and say he possessed the intangibles I mentioned, people have to remember Kelly while a good fighter, was not an ATG fighter like a Barrera or a Pacquiao.
    Naseem Hamed showed heart vs Manuel Medina, Paul Ingle. Both fights were very tough and he prevailed.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing