ICE COLD - Don't take this a dig at you because it isn't......but

Something you don't appreciate is that your age is very relevant. You CANNOT get the same appreciation of an era of boxing or a particular fighter if you weren't there living it at the time. This is why you don't think Tyson would beat Lewis. You don't have the benefit of being around at the time and really getting a taste of how awesome he was. He didn't get notorius for his exploits out of the ring, because he didn't have any exploits out of the ring cira 85-88, he got it through being the most amazing heavyweight since Ali. If this weren't true then why didn't Lewis or Holmes get the same adulation or media (inside the sport aswell) attention. Anyway I digress back to Tyson v Lewis (and don't wanna argue this one again! )

No doubt you are a fanatic and have watched hundreds of fights, but trust me it just isn't the same.

I wouldn't try to argue with Scrap about the sixties - coz although I have seen hundreds of fights, I wasn't there.

Like I said not a dig, but this where people are coming from when they mention age