Quote Originally Posted by skel1983
Quote Originally Posted by Jimboogie
Last night i watched Collazo-v-Hatton for the 1st time. Yes the first time!

For all the times ive defended Hatton against all the claimes he was beat fair n square etc... I realise now that Collazo really was robbed!!

I had it 115-114 to Collazo and that was with me (a Hatton fan) being ever so slightly biased to the hitman in scoring.

Im truely shocked and humbled
He was well and truely robbed but he only won by one point? Please explain?
I never said he was well & truely robbed. For a minute there yiou made me think i had.
I just said he really was robbed. As in everyone was saying he was and wow, you know what Collazo really did looked like a winner in that fight.

It seemed that every round Collazo was winning, he was winning it BIG! Hatton only really had a couple of good rounds (none if you go by his standard).

It looked like Collazo was the boss & he finished in style.