
Originally Posted by
miles
I will support the arguments that suggest that anybody who thought Taylor was winning comprehensively at the time of the stoppage is a complete fool.
Good for you..
Was he winning the fight comprehensively? No..it was back and forth action
Could he have been winning on points comprehensively? Quite possibly because of the criteria of scoring points and the knockdown in round 2.
So think i'm a fool thats fine..not bothered. You can jog on. Anyways I've said my peice on why I think Taylor was ahead and i'm not the only one who thinks so. Not discussing it anymore. I can see the flip side why some people would have Pavlik ahead too but people using words like 'you'd be a fool to think that' or 'thats Impossible' piss me off but hey what can you do but give your reasons why.
Bookmarks