Quote Originally Posted by Althugz
Why does everyone keep throwing the stats in for the arguement?? They tell me that Pavlik was missing a lot because Taylor landed the same amount if not more and threw a hell of a lot less!? Judges normally love accurate clean punching and making your opponent miss also counts for points!!
I don't give a S*** that you all don't agree with me because I can understand how someone could have scored it either way! Certain words used are just unjustified! Things like 'Were the judges smoking crack', 'impossible' and 'you'd be a fool for scoring it that way' aren't words that should be used for a fight that was fairly close and difficult to score!! 58-55 is a close score considering the knockdown!
Anyway I keep getting dragged back in to this! lol I think i'm going to get fired from work soon and it will all be Saddo's fault!
CC m8 i had it the exact same way, you score rounds on the way you interpret the fight is going and what you like to see. Personally i scored it on accuracy, efficency and the quality of the punches i scored the Hopkins Winky fight the same way and gave the fight to Hopkins eventhough im a Winky fan. To call people fools idiots ect is simply out of order and completely direspectful. The judges scored the fight similar and all of them had pritty much the same score and they are professionals. The fight was close and hard to score and you just got to go with who you feel did the better work.