Your kidding right?Originally Posted by Punisher136
From the beginning i said that peter was overrated, and this fight just adds more to my arguement. Wlad right now IS the hw champ here. A horrific knockout of jeremy williams is the only thing peter has done worth bragging about on his resume. 1 desputable win against and one ud over a blown up smw is not impressive to me at all. Once he faced an apponent whom could take his one dimensional skills, he got his faced turned into hamburger.
To this day, anyone who says the 3 knockdowns were not attributed to rabbit punches did not watch that fight.
Yes peter got up from 3 knockdowns to win the fight, it shows me he has heart, which i like. However, HE GOT KNOCKED DOWN 3 TIMES FROM MCCLINE.
Peter gets knocked down 3 times to win, he has heart, but klitschko gets knocked down 3 times from rabbit punches and he has no chin lmao.
My point is, he has shown me nothing to say he is what everyone says he is. To me, from what ive seen so far, he is another one dimensional Heavy that will fade sooner than most of you think.
How can you blame wlad for the matches he has had? except for the briggs fight (which was only to revenge a loss, which is what lewis is praised for). We dont have anyone since lewis to unify, he's tryin, now he's gonna get bagged for it? He puts samuel peter on queer street, beats him 114-111 after 3 knockdowns, and peter shouldnt have to prove himself to fight klitschko?
The ONLY reason i want peter v wlad 2 is to shut the people up who thing wlad was legitamtely in trouble against peter.
You know, i figured peter would beat maskaev (only because that how i much i think of maskaev) but now im not so sure...
Samuel peter against a real heavyweight (not a blown up smw) with good sound boxing skills can dominate peter easily. The only thing is, there isnt a big crop of those to go around as of late.
Bookmarks