So you're saying that Foreman should win past the age of 40 while it's acceptable for Holyfield to lose past the age of 40 because "age treats men differently,"??

What are you talking about ?? i said Foreman made some improvements in his later career which he did and that age treats people different to others thats obvisious i didn't say Foreman should win past the age of 40 but he was better fighter than what Holyfield was at 40.



You are really reaching, now.

I am ?? actually you put words into my mouth which i didn't say at all.


It's Holyfield's own fault for not retiring when he should have. If he wants to continue fighting until he's 60 years old and he finishes with 30 losses then that's on him.

Did i say it wasn't his fault ?? all im saying is that he was well past it when he lost to the likes of Donald ect and you keep bringing up those loses trying to discredit Holyfield alot of fighters lose past there prime.