
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
I made a post regarding this following the second Vazquez Marquez fight but on reflection I think it's a bad idea.
Take yesterdays fight between heavyweights TJ Wilson and Travis Walker.
Walker was getting his a** handed to him, the ref thought he was in danger of getting hurt so he stopped the fight.
If the standing 8 count rule were in effect he could have conceivably waded in and given Walker a nice breather and restarted the action in the centre of the ring.
Where would the justice be in that for Wilson?
'Err excuse me Wilson but you are giving Walker too much of a hiding on these ropes, I'm just going to break you up and stick you both back in the centre of the ring after I've given Walker a little rest',
F*** that, let them fight!
I missed the fight but that sounds like an illadvised 8 count.I think its a Breather for both.The ref looks at him and if hes hurt bad(walk to me) its over.If he complies then they prevent a shi!!!! stoppage and a Cheap ko win and its mute.
If Wilson was that dominate he regroups and resumes as well as a point added
I dont know Bilbo,I totally understand the other side and you make a good point ,the less intrusive a ref. is,the farer and better for the fighters to sort it out.
There are examples either way.
BTW,do they really make you resume in the ring center over there?That is a Dumbarse rule.In the states they would leave you where you were.
Bookmarks