Ditto DK,I want to know what Taeth was thinking too!Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
Originally Posted by El Gamo
LOL,Taeth,just when I think you're starting to make some cool threads and posts and you come out with "Fight a southpaw isn't a pure boxing match"?! What the hell is that man! There are few purer boxers than Spinks and Paulie!Originally Posted by SeanE
I disagree. It's just a different kind of boxing match. Plenty of southpaws are pure boxers. If Spinks was orthodox, with his skill set, he could give still Mayweather problems, though I'll repeat, Floyd would win any day.Originally Posted by Taeth
People don't see to be listening. Fight a southpaw isn't a pure boxing match, because first of all Mayweather isn't as good against southpaws, and second he doesn't really box them, he comes straight forward. That takes out all southpaws. Also I am talking present tense.
I wasn't going to mention it but since El G brought it up....WTF is fight a southpaw not pure boxing match mean anyway?.....because the guy is lefty he cant be considered a pure boxer?...or because they are opposite stances the fight between the two can not be pure boxing because they do not stand the same?....
I am just curious![]()


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks