Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Quote Originally Posted by Nium
Siaca and Beyer were the two worst titlists in boxing.
So Siaca & Beyer and Eubank & Lacy or Mitchell? I mean not much there to choose from right?
Hmm..dunno about that. There's quite a big difference.

Eubank is rated top 10 best ever Supermiddle by everyone that knows their a*** from their elbow. Beyer and Siaca most certainly aren't.

Plus Siaca lost TWICE to Byron Mitchell. That makes Mitchell defintely superior to Siaca. Considering Mitchell didn't last six minutes with Calzaghe I think that speaks volumes.

Maybe Siaca and Beyer are more like Calzaghe's Sheika and Woodhall.
While I am a Calzaghe fan...I am also a Kessler fan...so I'd like to say this UNBIASED :

Both men have fought damned good opposition & both men have taken down the supermiddleweight division...whether all of us keyboard critics appreciate that or not is all to our fault.

None of us are in there...picking & choosing opponents nor are we in the ring hammering out those wins...so it's easy to be a critic.

The fact of the matter is that they have both, at one time or another, faced the best that 168lbs has to offer & they both came out with a win & smelling like a rose. Many on this site are guilty of slating a name that they don't know or belittling records...that's just shitty. These men have both taken on all comers available and have remained undefeated prior to facing one another...so show a little respect.

That is directed at the poster who threw up these two bullshit threads.