Quote Originally Posted by Puya
First lose the fight against Mosley part II then he fights Vargar....why? he lost by KO to Tito, after that goes up to fight Felix Sturm he won the fight but almost everyone felt that he lost that fight. Then I give him credit for fighting B-Hop but lost by KO. This is the part I most hate.....HE is decided not to fight Winky after he(Winky) Pick apart Tito in a fashion way but goes to fight MAYORGA the one who lost by KO to Tito and of course Oscar won it. Then he decides to look for smaller opponents and finds Mayweather who was extremely hungry for money and lost by SD a fight that in my eyes he lost by 2 rounds 116-112.
This paragraph doesn't make much sense, and the parts that do make sense are just wrong.

The Vargas fight was a big big fight that was very entertaining and fought at a high level. Who cares if Vargas lost to Tito? Was Vargas never supposed to get a big fight again just because he lost to Tito at the age of 22? Makes no sense.

Oscar fought Mayorga instead of Winky because he had been off for 20 months and needed a comeback fight at 154. Also, it's not like Winky was just sitting around, he was at 160 fighting Jermain Taylor for the middleweight title.

Finally, fighting Mayweather wasn't a case of Oscar "looking for smaller opponents." What I would call it is Oscar "looking for the undisputed best pound-for-pound fighter in the world."

Why in the world he is so deserving to fight Cotto or the winner of Hatton / Mayweather ? this 3 are Elite while Oscar is NO MORE. Like everyone else he has to fight hes way up to get another chance For example....
Now this I actually agree with. Cotto should fight the Mayweather/Hatton winner and I'd prefer that Oscar not get in the way of that.