Quote Originally Posted by Mr140
Bring up good points depends what you look at the opposition, dominance and how many title defences. To me Tyson was champ in one of the weakest era of boxing. While Holyfeild was just under Lewis and there era is better then all of the eras except for Ali era but still just what you look at.
THANK YOU!!!! CC

All these Tyson fans still harp on how bad ass he was and how he destroyed whoever he fought....guys he fought an ancient Larry Holmes and Michael Spinks who didn't want anything but the paycheck. Tyson wasn't challenged until after his prime in the "Holyfield, Bowe, Lewis" era.....and he didn't fight Lewis in the 90's when he was really tough and may have posed a threat and he NEVER fought Bowe....he fought Bruno, Rudduck, and Golota, and Holyfield too.....that was convieniently "past his prime" amazing how that works ain't it? Tyson becomes past his prime when he fights good opponents....I for one don't think it's a coincidence