Looks like Pacquiao is going to fight David Diaz in March-thoughts?

[bzkfn]

A lot has been said about pac on this thread and uncalled for disrespectful comments to a fighter that has given us boxing excitement in the recent past. After the announcement that Pac will indeed fight JMM I dont see you guys apologizing as fast as you criticized the man. But anyway, this is boxing and we cannot eliminate biases. Here is the article.

http://philboxing.com/news/story-13934.html

If he fights Marquez, then fairplay to him. I have no interest in watching him destroy David Diaz though. Diaz next fight should be Casamayor. As much as I think both of them were gifted decisions in their last fights, there is no room for the confusion of interim titles.

[brucelee]

I think the address you gave titleist is wrong. it's in ftp. here it is: http://philboxing.com/news/story-13934.html


by the way, does this news confirm the fact that Pacquaio will not duck anyone? This is a very exciting news for me.

I'm opening the bet now. 1000 cc and a signature bet. Pacquaio wins over Marquez.Signature bet will last as soon as the 1000 cc are already given. That would mean 1000 days unless Saddo will interfere.

Takers, anyone

[Addicted to_boxing]

Why is it not clear to you that JMM has every option to fight all the options Pac has as well?

[b]yes he can but a fight with PAC will be the biggest payday for him. and JMM physically cant go up in weight to fight diaz. he is too small and pay is not that big. .................... so could it be Pac is just too physical for the JMM and old guys like EM & MAB that originally started at lower weights. It looks like Muscle vs flab when you see them in the ring. Perhaps PAC needs to fight true in weight opponents like Guzman and Valero.


Why is it beyond you to accept that a title holder would want the larger purse?

[b]of course the title holder wants the bigger cut, but in the case of PAC who draws more paying people than JMM and 75% 25% is too much for PAC. That is true but those figures are ridiculous what ever happened to 60-40 ? When in this lifetime did 75% 25%
become a equitable offer?


PAC fans are content if PAC continues winning over old worn fighters, or a move up to challenge the lightest hitting / regarded one.

[b]eversince for me PAC fights for the money, a boxer who just fights anyone whether he is out gunned or is not payed well just to prove that he has big cajones is DUMB and STUPID. When has has Pac ever taken or entered the ring regarded as the lesser puncher?

its common sense since it will be his first time on that weight its better to take a slightly easy opponent right?
Yes it is, but Pac needs to clean out the division the has dusted off the old remnants and needs to adddress the current top challengers. Then no negative comments can be made.

yes he can but a fight with PAC will be the biggest payday for him. and JMM physically cant go up in weight to fight diaz. he is too small and pay is not that big. This contradicts the comment above where you state JMM is to small to move up but conveniently JMM is the perfect weight to get bulllied by a physically superior Pac. Guess I just want to see how PAC fares against an opponent that has superior power and physical advantage. to see how Pac manages to make adjustments rather than wade true less hitting foes. People want to see him face some adversity before anointing him More praise.
above

[mnmc10]

When has Pac ever taken or entered the ring regarded as the lesser puncher? <== alot of times! remember pac mab 1?

thing is whoever pac fights its either he beat an old fighter or he does not want to fight bigger opponents, thing is EM and MAB where bigger fighters than pac before he whooped der arses! sad is that you guys think that its because those fighters where either old or faded. what does it take for pac to prove to you guys that he is a really really good boxer?

[Addicted to_boxing]

When has Pac ever taken or entered the ring regarded as the lesser puncher? <== alot of times! remember pac mab 1?

thing is whoever pac fights its either he beat an old fighter or he does not want to fight bigger opponents, thing is EM and MAB where bigger fighters than pac before he whooped der arses! sad is that you guys think that its because those fighters where either old or faded. what does it take for pac to prove to you guys that he is a really really good boxer?

(Not true, I am all for him fighting Valero, Soto and Guzman all low mileage top fighters.) Where do you get that EM and MAB were bigger fighters they moved from lower weights as did PAC. The difference is that EM and MAB weight increase is more attributed to to them getting older and slower. It is/was visibility evident how much slower and less muscle mass is/was attached to EM and MAB's bodies. I do not dislike Pac I just want to see him in competitive bouts.




mmm as in stutter ? MAB was never a puncher learn your facts ! MAB scored his KO's on accumulation not on punching strength. So I ask again when has PAC entered a fight as the lesser puncher or physically inferior boxer?

[ICB]

typical....so typical to try and pick apart a fighter. Theres not even a valid article that points out there was already an offer of a 57-43 split in favor of pac. nice try doode but how ever your effort goes, pac ain't never duck anyone nor will he ever. for jmm not to take a 40-60 deal with pac is whats foolish, he ain't gonna get no other mega fight. There is no other mega fight but one with pacman. Pac can move up and feel things out fighting david whats wrong with that. hell who has fought the best of the best like pac has. his first fight at 126 was mab and his first fight at 130 was eric. what is casa or juan suppose to be who he fights first at 135? eventually he'll get to them. As of now pac doubters need to enjoy these times of misleading articles and rumors til contracts are signed and pac whooping a** again inside the ring whom ever it is. Jmm best stay sharp, now that casa ain't look too good. Jmm is the only one that can give pac a lost and thats being nice.

Please STFU. Whenever I post something,I ALWAYS go by sources and not my own opinions. Here's 1 source,I can find lots more. http://boards.hbo.com/topic/Boxing-M...ts/2000000432&
prior agreement between Top Rank and GBP mandates that the Marquez fight would mean a 57-43% split in favor of Pacquiao. Source: Manilla Bulletin.

Next time,do some research or shut up before you post S*** like "there's not even a valid article". Just because YOU have not seen one does not mean there isn't one

What the hell Gamo ?? never seen that side of you before.

[ICB]

cc for that KKisser. Let us just wait 'til it happens. Claiming that Pacquaio is ducking Marquez is way disrespectful of Pacquaio. Let's not be making accusations here. In truth and in fact, PAcquaio will fight Marquez anytime and anywhere...... and most probably he will win over Marquez. However, there are things also that must be considered (for example, the pay and the cut the fighters receive).

Marquez only agreed lately. Before, he was insistent of getting the same share or whatever share he wants (which pacquaio's camp did not agree with). When Pacquaio's camp went to the Diaz' camp and when everything seems to be settled, Marquez is now claiming he will abide with whatever Pacquaio's camp wanted.It could be a little late already as PAcquaio and Diaz may have agreed already on fighting.

EG, PAcquaio is not the one who delayed things. It was Marquez.Now regarding Marquez fighting Guzman, I really believe Marquez has a higher chance of winning against Guzman than winning against Pacquaio.Therefore, it will even be better for Marquez to fight Guzman first ( and win) to make his fight with Pacquaio more interesting.Did you get my point now?

Deng Bruce! Good point.

How are yah bro? How y'all doing? It's been months.

Can't wait to see mah boi Pac win again. I really do hope he would fight Marquez again.

Peace out from PI!

Its about time you man up and bet on the Marquez vs Pacquiao fight with me