NO jmm is a great fighter but no he shouldn't be undefeated. Ice you said jmm is one of the best textbook boxer in history, but i hope you won't be suprise if pac outboxes him. Yes thats right pac outboxing jmm. Pac has improve immensely, years ago they said his too one demensional but he outbox and outgunned mabman right after jmm nearly lost if not lose to mabman. Jmm couldn't do what pac did to mab and saying its becuase mab is past it and had too many war is also taking away from jmm since he nearly lost to mab just before pac beat him more convincingly then jmm did.

Norwood beat jmm but I think jmm got robbed against chris john. The fist battle with pac was a close fight and if anyone wants to talk technically, then pac should of won it technically if not for the mistake the ref admittedly made.

Also being undefeated means nothing, None of the greatest of great fighters were undefeated. Duckers and Protected fighters are the ones who stay undefeated. Real Great fighters fight even when they are not ready as in primed, they battle the best without waiting to get to their, and when they do reach their prime thats when its clear they are a true great fighter. Even with the lose in their earlier years, they still come back to show how great they are. Being undefeated just meant you never went through the best consistently.