unpopular opinions that you have.

Hawkeye · 06-02-2005 02:47 AM

Originally Posted by alex w

nah naz would have won anyday. he punched real hard, moved at the speed of light and really put people off their game plan with all the showboating and taunting.
his style was so weird you couldnt look at him and prepare. if you were fighting paw youd think about counterpunches, the defense and crisp headmovement otherwise hed knock your ass out.

It sounds like your describing Superman, moved at the speed of light?
Where is he now?
He didn't stay in the game because he was embarrassed against Barrera and didn't want to get punked again in a prized fight!
It's ridiculous to hear you praise a boxer and tell us what he would do when he doesn't even exist anymore... he's extinct!!
Morales, Barrera, and others aren't, their still around fighting at their best!!

**Pugilistic** · 11-25-2008 09:00 AM

Hopkins could beat Hagler.
Calzaghe would dominate Pavlik. ( my opinion on that was supposedly crazy before the Hopkins fight, Not so crazy now though is it ?)
Prime for prime Hopkins could beat Jones.
Mosley is overated.
Paul Williams is also overated.

**antimoron** · 11-25-2008 09:54 AM

1- Undefeated fighters with talent and presumed great are untested and ducking the real deal. (as the case of Guzman, PBF, Calzaghe)
2- Ring Mag ratings are tainted since it was acquired by Goldie Company

**Boom Boom** · 11-28-2008 02:59 PM

B-Hop is a top 10 fighter of all time.

Willie Pep is The Greatest fighter of all time.

John Ruiz is a good fighter.

**Phil** · 11-28-2008 05:31 PM

Originally Posted by Boom Boom

B-Hop is a top 10 fighter of all time.

Willie Pep is The Greatest fighter of all time.

John Ruiz is a good fighter.

Really?

**Spicoli** · 09-12-2009 12:37 AM

Mandatory

....oh and KO's are very overrated....as are undefeated records.

Golden boy promotions with implode one day,in the near future.The lawsuits and turmoil will be worthy of a Jerry springer 'best of' show.