Quote Originally Posted by Mr140
Floyd to me at welterweight is just another belt holder i mean to be linear dont you need more then one belt. And look at Mayweaters best wins at welter are Baldomiar and Juhda and Cotto best wins are against Mosley and Juhda and if you look at the other Cotto in my eyes just beat better people at the weight so i consider him the better guy at welter i do not care what Floyd has done at the other weights to be honest with you because they werent WW.
No to be linear champ you need to beat the champ! Belts don't mean sh*t. Mayweather could have no alphabet belts but he would still the Ring champion! IMO Floyd beats Cotto so as well as being the champion at 147 he is also the best fighter. Hopefully when Floyd's defeated Hatton he'll fight Cotto so we'll all know for sure who the best guy is!