
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
It's not racist Rhun. The balck man has a long history stretching back hundreds of years of being oppressed by white's. If they have any resentments it's nothing to do with being racist and everything to do with history.
Growing up as a black in America where white's rule you are bound to feel some resentment and general hostility.
Is it any coincidence that virtually all of boxing's most flashy and flamboyant characters are/were black?
They have come from being part of a social underclass to being achievers in a white world.
It may sound hypocritical to say it would have been racist if the other way around but that is defintely the case here because of history.
I've said this before on the forum but past association is everything.
If Santa puts your child on his knee, ruffles there hair and shouts 'Ho ho ho, merry christmas' and gives them a present it's fun and part of what christmas is supposed to be about. If Gary Glitter on the other hand was to attempt to do that to your child you'd have a different mindset entirely.
Black people in general don't have any power to racially subjecate white people so they have little power to actually be racist.
Black gangs certainly can act racially in America but how can Hopkins actually be racist towards Calzaghe?
If you were to tell me you hated your boss and thought he was a c*** that's no crime. If your boss on the other hand tells another senior member of staff that you are a c*** that could be construed as intimidation or prejadicial seeing as your boss and other senior members of your workplace have authority over you.
Does that make sense?
Bookmarks