Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Quote Originally Posted by El Gamo
LOL,my man Mick,you've messed it up. Condes won. There is no doubt about the winner. The ONLY doubt was whether he won via UD or SD. It was initially an SD but was shcnaged to a UD? Get it? Rachman didn't win,it's an L for him,the only issue is whether the L is a UD or SD. It SHOULD be a UD?
I think I might have confused myself there with the scores...
But the decision is still marked as SD, when it should be UD.
That's what I was originally asking.
I'm gonna try and resend the e-mail see if someone responds this time.
Dude your confusing yourself. They probably won't email back because there is nothing to say. It was an SD,changed to a UD,without OFFICIALLY being changed,probably because they could not be assed. Either way,Condes won by UD or SD. It's still a W.


Quote Originally Posted by penalosafan
Yo bro Gamo, how you've been?

Not sure about our boy, he's a punch eater. I think he won't last long as a champ unless he changes his style. Don't know much about Niida. But of course, hope our boy Condes wins. Wait a second, Niida is our boy too. But since I'm here, I'll go with the local boy, that's Condes, of course.
My man,how have you been?How are things? I thing Condes is a little too 1 dimensional for my liking but he is certainly strong and agressive. I love Niida's style,although I've only seen his last 3 fights,he's excellent to watch. I'd favour Niida for sure.