I posted on another thread about this so will say the same thing here. The fight was competitive in terms of action but if you look at the punch stats then I think a score of 88-82 is fair. He is my reasoning with punch stats taken from the BBC website. I have added how I scored the rounds afterwards based on the punchstats only.

Round 1- PBF 12 landed/ 37 thrown. Hatton 5 landed/ 24 thrown. 10/9 PBF
Round 2 - PBF 7 landed/ 27 thrown. Hatton 6 landed/ 30 thrown. 10/10
Round 3 - PBF 11/27. Hatton 7/36. 10/9 PBF
Round 4 - PBF 15/46. Hatton 6/44. 10/9 PBF
Round 5- PBF 6/25. Hatton 13/54. 10/9 Hatton
Round 6- PBF 8/45. Hatton 10/30. 9/9
Round 7- PBF 12/36. hatton 6/41. 10/9 PBF
Round 8- PBF 32/55. Hatton- 6/38. 10/8 PBF
Round 9- PBF 15/31. Hatton 4/44. 10/9 PBF
Round 10- PBF 9/15. Hatton 2/16

- Therefore PBF landed 127 of the 344 he threw. Hatton landed 65 of the 357 he threw.

- PBF outlanded Hatton by 8 rounds to 2 although Hatton threw more in 6 of the 10 rounds.

- PBF connect percentage 37%. Hatton connect percentage 18%.

The three points above are reflected by a score of 88/82 to PBF.

Finally, after the 6th round and with the point deduction, Billy Graham said to Hatton he was 2 down. After the 6th round in my scoring it is 58/56 to PBF so for me even the Hatton camp are thinking along similar lines in terms of the scoring.

p.s. Did anyone notice David Hayes white socks on SKY? Shocking!