Yeah I read this last night, good article and he does make some very valid points.

My counter argument would be though in place of 4 or 5 meaningless world title belts why not have one world title belt in each division but a host of meaningful other belts.

I mean if it actually meant a great deal to be the Americas champ or the Asian champ etc then they could serve in place of world title belts.

Ultimately though it's too far gone now and nothing could ever change so best leave it the way it is.