Quote Originally Posted by El Gamo
Althoug I've been persuaded around by some of you RING hardcores and your admittedly superb arguments which countered all of my inefficient ones with regards to the issue of 1 champ per division,here is an article that questions the significance of the 1 champ per division idea. A superb read from Steve Kim,1 of my fave writers. Check it out and post your thoughts.

http://www.m axboxing.com/Kim/Kim121407.asp

Just join the M and A together and follow the link peeps.Real interesting thoughts.
Good article, that.

I used to believe that Boxing should scrap the Alphabets and place much heavier emphasis on the Geographical titles. For me i feel that works from grass roots right up to wrold level.... Well, it did but like Bilbo says. Its too far gone now.....

In regards to th earticle, I sort of agree to the extent that multiple belts per division gives the better illusion of more premier fighters per division. And ultimately, that can entail more money being thrown around the sport.

However, i would just like to see far more UNIFICATION attempts than there actually are. Even if it was two major straps. Everyone recognizes the term UNDISPUTED champion. Tell me how many fighters out there at this point can be named as such?

Not enough, if you ask me.