Should There Be 3 Knockdown's Rule ??

[donnydarkoIRL]

Monkey and Donny, you're the only two that don't understand so -

Is there the possibility that a ref can call a knockdown incorrectly? Yes.

Is there any examples of refs calling knockdowns incorrectly? Yes.

Is there the possibilty an incorrect call could have a bearing on a fight? Yes.

Does this affect the three-knockdown rule? Yes.

Does this show the three-knockdown rule is highly flawed? Yes.

The end.

Very condescending.

I'll go over it one more time.....
Is it likely to happen that three slips in one round could be ruled knockdowns? No.

Is it true that a fighter knocked down three times (and alloweed continue) is a lot more likely to suffer injury? Yes.

Which is more important. A fighters health or letting fights continue so as to come to a satisfying conclusion for "the fans?"............

It's not about LIKELY. It's possible. Therefore proves the three-knockdown rule is flawed. Fact.

I'll give you one more chance - EXPLAIN why Marquez should have been PREVENTED from continuing against Pac? Even though you believe he WON THE FIGHT!!!

Would you agree that it is also a strong possability that a fightergetting knocked down three times would be likely to sustain an injury if allowed continue?

And as you didn answer my question I womn't answer yours.

However i think I mad my logic clear.
Had there been a three knockdown rule yes, it should have been stopped, but there wasn't.
Do I still believe there should be a three knockdown rule? Yes.
Why? Because fighters that get knocked down more than twice oin a round find themselves 10-7 down and are extremely like to be badly hurt.


Fighters before fans.