I'll always favor the old school fighter for the simple reasons that they're legacy is set and that they've already done what the fighter today is trying to do.

I always comment on fighters I have seen theres a shit! load of fightes whom I havent seen much of.
I mean really how many Pep, Leonard, Walker, Burley etc. etc. FULL fights are around? Or how many of us have actually seen a moren then 3 full fights on these fighters?
Yet people try to talk about them and make them unbeatable sure they look good in small 1 min. clips or whatever they've read on them. That's why when I read comments around here I bite my tongue and seal my lips and try hard not to quote that person. I just skip that post and move on.... Sometimes I can't help it but comment.

One of my fav. things here is when people say and I quote "I've seen all of his fights"
Not knowing theres some fights that are proven and known NOT to be any footage on.... It makes me laugh but I don't bother with it I just overlook it. Prime examples when people comment on Tyson and say I've seen all of his fights... Uuuum!! There is 1 known fight that there is absolutely NO video on but yet people say they've seen all of his fights.
Same thing with Cotto people say I've seen all of his fights.... Uuum!! There is also 1 known fight that there is NO video of but people say they have seen all of his fights. Go figure?

Anyway.... Back to the title of the thread on occasion for example PBF now IMO has proven he's an all-time great. I would def. favor him to beat some of the past all time greats. Like JCC, Hiroshi, Flash, Mitchell @ Super Feather. At Lightweight I think he beats Ortiz, Duran, Laguna and Ambers. PBF has proven this IMO....