COME ON GUYS I WANT YOUR TOP TEN FEATHERWEIGHTS OF ALL TIME

[CutMeMick]

mick its kinda hard putting pac in that list but im glad you did. Reason being is that I don't think we will remember pac at 126 as much as we will remember him above that weight. The first fight with mab is clearly his first rise to the top but imo pac just scrape the featherweight then never took more time to be listed as a 126'pounder. I'd favor JMM to be listed as a 125pounder cause after pac,mab,eric left it was jmm's division. Unlike how all four was once there, nobody could really claim the division for themselves. Exept mab before pac beat him he was dubbed featherweight KING. Afterwards pac was never dubbed as king though, he was dubbed as the "peoples champ" remember that mick? then pac insisted he wanted eric, but he had to fight jmm first at 126....we all know what happened there. He still got his fight with eric though but not at 126, they would have their trilogy at 130.

Honestly Julius I'm not sure what your trying to tell me here?
You don't think Pac belongs in the top 10, is that what your saying?

I said earlier that jmm is more suited in that list then pac becuase jmm does not have much fights at 130 as a matter of fact he has very little and a lot more at 126. As for pac, his career may have began to reach elite class at the featherweights but his already planning on moving to lightweights and I believe he has a lot more damage to do in that division although he reck havok at the featherweight/superfeatherweight division. So we should all stay tune

I think they are both suited for this list of Featherweights. Pacs win alone over MAB is monumental and for that he's there.

also I don't know how you can rate S.salvador at number 1, when you say you haven't gotten to see enough of sandler and pep thats why you didn't list them.

Julius is it me or does this sentense not make sense.
I said I can't list Pep & Sandler because I haven't seen enough of them to rate them. On the other hand I have seen lot's of Sanchez fights I would say about 24 Sanchez fights so I'm pretty confident in placing him there.

In sanches case, he never even reach his prime though and only had a few fights to declare his greatness

Oddly enough I think he was in his prime. I mean it's all based on opinion but after beating Gomez to me that's where it all began and I think he would have reigned supreme long after that.

I just want to ask if your sure sanchez is the best featherweight of all time?

Yes. I am 100% sure he is the best Featherweight my eyes have seen.

In that case, do you think history repeated itself but this one at featherweight and not flyweight. Because in my oppinion pancho was the same story but at the flyweights. What do you think?

I can't comment on Pancho or Jimmy. I mean tell me who here has seen at least 10 full Pancho or Jimmy fights? Not highlights full fights?
I gonna take a guess at that one and say none..... I can't and wont comment on fighters I don't know enough of. So sorry I can't say much there other then the kid looked talented and I've read he was something special.
Flyweights are in this order for me: (Again fighters whom I've seen)

Canto
LaBarba
Laciar
Pascual
Chionoi
Efren
Gonzalez
Ohba
Arce
Chitalada