He was still competing at high level way after that like against Ottke, Magee, etc.
Maybe but those fights happened in excess of 3 years beore when he was fighting Froch and was at that time fighting actively, not after a long layoff wanting to earn a bit more cash.
Earl has only been in with one world class name and did he win ?? nope, did he get a pasting ?? yep.
Name one world class fighter that Froch has been in with which they are not SHOT, Earls beat Romanov the current EBU lightweight champ in prime.
Earl was beaten by 9-0 fighter in 2005
At least Ricky Burns was known on the British scene and had 6 fights more.
He went 12 rounds with Bute just before Froch fight so he had plenty left.
Yes and how many rounds did he win Ice

i'll tell you just 1 on two of the scorecards so that makes him real good does'nt it.
Well it was only in 2004 and he did give Eastman a good argument, and remember Eastman has been in there with the likes of Hopkins, Joppy.
Yes and got beat by both of them.
Give me examples of when i have said this ?? Oh don't tell me your on about Collazo vs Hatton situation are you ??
Yep
Oh well im sorry to hurt your feelings but facts are facts, Collazo was caught cold by flash knockdown he wasn't hurt at all. If that isn't flash knockdown what is then ??
You tell me, but a flash knockdown certainly was not when Earl dropped Katsidis.
Katsidis was caught off balance he was knocked down and got straight back up and continued to give Earl a beating, except for that split second moment. Earl was never in the fight and got a bad beating.
So he never rocked Katsidis then ?? yes he did take a look after the knockdown Katsidis was wobbling.
Earl was not warmed up properly and he didn't look to have really any fire in him and soon as the bell sounded i could see it. He got caught cold as he didn't expect Khan to come out so fast after the 1st knock down he was finished.
Not warmed up properly

so every fighter who gets bet in the 1st round it's because there not warmed up properly, give over, the fact of the matter is Earl did'nt realise how good Khan was and got took to school.
Because Katsidis landed about 100 more punches.
And did'nt Ko him in the ring or force the ref to stop it and also Earl as throwing shots back when Katsidis was on the attack but he never with Khan as Khan gave him no space to do so. What does that say about Katsidis' then

please tell me ICB

[
u]
Like Earl, Khan, Warren, would admit that get real. Every boxer thinks they have one last good one in them, and Khan is hardly going to admit Earl is past his best, and Warren manages Khan so you think he would say Earl was past it ?? just think about that for a second.[/u]
Warren also mangaes Earl too BTW and it's funny the way people say Earl was shot after he got destroyed by Khan to the same token Castillo was shot when he got destroyed by Hatton. I don't know ey
Plenty on this forum thought Earl had a decent chance because of his power, and they see how feather fisted Limond wobbled and dropped Khan. But i also see a lot of members on here saying Earl was past his peak.
What happened in the next round did not Khan break his nose and jaw to Limond
Yes but how does one good performance against decent opponent, make him rated higher than Froch ?? explain that.
Did I ever say he's rated higher than Froch

but he's fought better opposition than Froch has I can safely say that and I can say Froch has fought bums or past contenders not modern age.
Bookmarks