Quote Originally Posted by shza
Quote Originally Posted by Ice Cold Boxing
Quote Originally Posted by shza
You people are crazy. Hopkins would definitely UD Kessler. It would be ugly and boring, but it wouldn't be controversial.
Why is it crazy to think the younger fresher Kessler can win ?? he certainly has the tools to beat Hopkins.
He does not have the tools to beat Hopkins. That's completely ridiculous. Kessler is solid. He's not great. Hopkins, even at 43, is a top 10 p4p fighter on skill alone. Kessler is way too slow and plodding and would land next to nothing. (Hopkins would also land next to nothing, since he only throws about 100 punches a fight these days, but he would consistently land the cleaner shots -- Kessler is not hard to hit.) This thread is ridiculous. Do you people really think Calzaghe will have an easier time with Hopkins than he did with Kessler? I saw the Calzaghe-Kessler fight as an all-out domination....
This a great post. And I agree. I got Hopkins beating Kessler. With some difficulties, but it would be a clear-cut win