Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29

Thread: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    4,759
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1332
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
    I dont like Warren because he hides his fighters so he can keep making money off them rather then allowing them to build a real legacy
    And it shows in the Calzaghe/Kessler fights numbers, a 2.8 share is pathetic for a unification bout
    But that sillyness of the negotiations played well in England,and it was all Frank.I mean come on,he tried to get them to sign on to the fight by offering the European TV rights,like that was a real offer.
    The sillyness of the stupid Christmas ad is typical Warren crap,its worked before,but come on,does anybody think your going to strong arm a guy who did 4 years in Graterford with a stupid ad in the Guardian?
    But everyone in the UK views these little bouts of ridiculousness on Warrens part,as a sign that theyre serious about wanting this fight
    Theyve been offered 3 million more then Joe said he wanted to do the fight,now sign on the dotted line,and spare us the silly ads
    Bullshit... you name one fight that didn't come off because of Warren? Hopkins? thats signed and sealed hopkins alone pulled out of that... Glen Johnson? ok no a big talent, but a name, and great win over him in style could of forced america to call for a big fight, Joe pulled out of that 3 times with injury... Warren done his job and got johnson for him THREE times, almost a 4th too if the kessler fight wasn't going to come off... Warren got him Lacy twice...

    Would any of his wins of been moe impressive in the us? Any great fighter would tell you, when you step in that ring, and that bell goes, they all feel all alone, don't matter shit what country they are in.

    Didn;t Roy Recently say he viewed calzaghe as to big a threat back then, that it was small a reward for beating him? i seen sumin brief about it, think daxx posted it? maybe u can help me out here daxx?

    As far as i can see, there is little more Warren could of done to make Calzaghe any bigger than he is now... untill Lacy and kessler came along, it was basicaly Hopkins & Roy, and he made them both more than substantial offers.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    105
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    934
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    For whatever reason Calzaghe hasn't fought very many top fighters. Maybe its his handlers fault, maybe everyone is terrified of him or maybe the money wasn't there or maybe he didn't want to leave Europe to fight, one can only guess. It's unfortunate that his card is so lacking because now that he has the name recognition he will have the chance to fight several of the names he needs on his card to be considered an alltime great. The problem is at 35 years old he very well may be past his prime physically and not capable of displaying his full talents for more than a couple more fights. I hope he takes this chance and takes on all comers before he is too old not to retire.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3127
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
    I dont like Warren because he hides his fighters so he can keep making money off them rather then allowing them to build a real legacy
    And it shows in the Calzaghe/Kessler fights numbers, a 2.8 share is pathetic for a unification bout
    But that sillyness of the negotiations played well in England,and it was all Frank.I mean come on,he tried to get them to sign on to the fight by offering the European TV rights,like that was a real offer.
    The sillyness of the stupid Christmas ad is typical Warren crap,its worked before,but come on,does anybody think your going to strong arm a guy who did 4 years in Graterford with a stupid ad in the Guardian?
    But everyone in the UK views these little bouts of ridiculousness on Warrens part,as a sign that theyre serious about wanting this fight
    Theyve been offered 3 million more then Joe said he wanted to do the fight,now sign on the dotted line,and spare us the silly ads
    You don't seem to realise those press release thingys are posted on promoters sites then picked up by all the other boxing sites on the net. They're for a global boxing audience not specifically aimed at the UK.. So I don't know why you keep referring to "everyone in the UK" or "UK fans?"

    This isn't about USA vs UK. NO-one in the UK apart from the hardest of the hardcore boxing fan has ever heard of Bernard Hopkins let alone seen him fight.

    Judging by this site alone, there's plenty of Brits that would root for Hopkins like plenty of Americans would root for Calzaghe.

    Your gist of the Warren "lies" situation is - You don't believe Calzaghe's mob want the fight but are pretending they do by releasing lies to the press, right? Maybe you are right, but you'll look a right proper MUPPET if the fight is signed
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Lewis
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
    I dont like Warren because he hides his fighters so he can keep making money off them rather then allowing them to build a real legacy
    And it shows in the Calzaghe/Kessler fights numbers, a 2.8 share is pathetic for a unification bout
    But that sillyness of the negotiations played well in England,and it was all Frank.I mean come on,he tried to get them to sign on to the fight by offering the European TV rights,like that was a real offer.
    The sillyness of the stupid Christmas ad is typical Warren crap,its worked before,but come on,does anybody think your going to strong arm a guy who did 4 years in Graterford with a stupid ad in the Guardian?
    But everyone in the UK views these little bouts of ridiculousness on Warrens part,as a sign that theyre serious about wanting this fight
    Theyve been offered 3 million more then Joe said he wanted to do the fight,now sign on the dotted line,and spare us the silly ads
    Bullshit... you name one fight that didn't come off because of Warren? Hopkins? thats signed and sealed hopkins alone pulled out of that... Glen Johnson? ok no a big talent, but a name, and great win over him in style could of forced america to call for a big fight, Joe pulled out of that 3 times with injury... Warren done his job and got johnson for him THREE times, almost a 4th too if the kessler fight wasn't going to come off... Warren got him Lacy twice...

    Would any of his wins of been moe impressive in the us? Any great fighter would tell you, when you step in that ring, and that bell goes, they all feel all alone, don't matter S*** what country they are in.

    Didn;t Roy Recently say he viewed calzaghe as to big a threat back then, that it was small a reward for beating him? i seen sumin brief about it, think daxx posted it? maybe u can help me out here daxx?

    As far as i can see, there is little more Warren could of done to make Calzaghe any bigger than he is now... untill Lacy and kessler came along, it was basicaly Hopkins & Roy, and he made them both more than substantial offers.
    No,actually he didnt
    What he offered was chump change,and with a ton of restrictions,where the fights going to be,who gets the TV rights,etc,etc
    All for a fighter who can only pull a 2.8 share in a unification bout for free in the states
    Bullshit indeed,but your the one spewing it

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    See I told you Fenster,everyone knows that Hopkins wanted the record for title defenses at middleweight
    So it would have taken a fortune to get him to vacate
    But Frank floats this little trial balloon,and back dates it no less,and heres somebody sucking at that teat.
    I told you,Brit fans fall for his b-s
    Same old song and dance,"He made an offer"
    But they could make more in the states
    "It was a great offer"
    They could both make more in the states
    Shut up you

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1999
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    Some points here.

    Hopkins agreed to fight Calzaghe in front of a bunch of people including the then head of Showtime then changed his mind the next day.

    Calzaghe fought a dozen times in England against English opposition before he fought for a title. No comfort zone there.

    Rather than Calzaghe-Hopkins affirming Joe as a legitimate champion, the fight will actually show a huge gulf between Calzaghe and Hopkins who will lose badly. Afterwards Calzaghe haters will say Hopkins was 43, Calzaghe wouldn't have beaten him in his prime etc. etc.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3127
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
    See I told you Fenster,everyone knows that Hopkins wanted the record for title defenses at middleweight
    So it would have taken a fortune to get him to vacate
    But Frank floats this little trial balloon,and back dates it no less,and heres somebody sucking at that teat.
    I told you,Brit fans fall for his b-s
    Same old song and dance,"He made an offer"
    But they could make more in the states
    "It was a great offer"
    They could both make more in the states
    Shut up you
    Why do you keep saying "Brit fans" "UK fans" -- Shouldn't you be saying "BOXING fans" or "CALZAGHE fans" - at the very least?

    I take it you're refering to Hopkins doubling the 3 to 6 million offer? (how many times )

    Jay Larkin said this not Frank Warren..

    ..."A teleconference was set up in my office in New York for July 30th, 2002, and on the call was myself, Don King who was in the room, Frank Warren and Bernard Hopkins' lawyer, Arnold Joseph. Along with Arnold was a woman named Linda Carter, who was there on behalf of Bernard. We asked Arnold if Bernard wanted to fight Joe Calzaghe and we asked him how much money would he want if he did. The response we got was $3million and the fight would have to take place in the United States. After a little scratching of the head, we said 'Okay, done.' Frank Warren agreed on the spot, Don King agreed and we agreed so as far as we were concerned all parties were singing off the one hymm sheet. Arnold excused himself with Linda and I can only assume it was to call Bernard. Either that day or the next day, they came with a new demand: $6million, dobule the sum that had been agreed, the deal blew up.....he had then and still has no desire to fight Joe Calzaghe, that much is pretty clear."


    Let me guess Jay Larkin is lying, right?
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    You mean the recently canned Jay Larkin,who didnt work for either Joes or Bernards production team?
    You mean that unemployed Jay Larkin right?
    Or is there another one out there
    Gullible as the day is long you lot are
    Let me clue you in,Calzaghe's stateside cable company is HBO
    Bernard turned down a multi fight deal with Showtime right after the Trinidad fight
    So how,exactly,would the head of Showtime boxing be in any position to have had either of them in a room agreeing to a fight.Especially in conjunction with a promoter Bernard doesnt use unless he has to,which he would have had no reason to do in this case.
    No please,this ought to be rich
    I mean other then the wrong network and the wrong promoter,the stories totally valid right?

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2279
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    The British Fighting legacy was long ago secured by guys like Jimmy Wilde, Randolph Turpin and Ken Buchannan
    091

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wales GB
    Posts
    763
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    958
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Cuchulain
    The British Fighting legacy was long ago secured by guys like Jimmy Wilde, Randolph Turpin and Ken Buchannan
    cc Damn right.
    "It wasn't the night of the jab"

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3127
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
    You mean the recently canned Jay Larkin,who didnt work for either Joes or Bernards production team?
    You mean that unemployed Jay Larkin right?
    Or is there another one out there
    Gullible as the day is long you lot are
    Let me clue you in,Calzaghe's stateside cable company is HBO
    Bernard turned down a multi fight deal with Showtime right after the Trinidad fight
    So how,exactly,would the head of Showtime boxing be in any position to have had either of them in a room agreeing to a fight.Especially in conjunction with a promoter Bernard doesnt use unless he has to,which he would have had no reason to do in this case.
    No please,this ought to be rich
    I mean other then the wrong network and the wrong promoter,the stories totally valid right?
    Calzgahe's HBO debut was Sakio Bika. ALL his previous fights had been on Showtime

    Read this it's from 2002 - in an interview with Maxboxing.com.

    Hopkins stated: "Right now I'm negotiating along with Don King and Jay Larkin of Showtime. Who we spoke to and we're going to talk to him about two fights, maybe my mandatory too, which makes it a three-fight deal.

    "It would be the mandatory, Harry Simon and Joe Calzaghe. While Calzaghe fights for that other super-middleweight title, I'll wait for that and knock off Simon after the mandatory and fight the WBO title."

    http://archive.southwalesargus.co.uk.../17/72933.html

    So.. there's no way Jay Larkin could have been involved in any discussions about a possible Hopkins-Calzaghe fight, right?

    Let me guess HOPKINS is LYING?
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    Interesting that it only exists on a South Wales rag,when everything he said here was he wanted the defenses record at middleweight,and who leaked this story?
    Why Frank Warren of course
    Interesting he had just turned down a 3 fight deal with Showtime,but suddenly wants a two fight deal with them
    Oh do please

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    Now if you wanted to make a case he dodged a rematch with Tito at middleweight,youve got a pretty good case.
    I have no idea what Tito's people were offering though

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3127
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins and the UK fighting Legacy

    Hold-up. Let me get this staight. You're now claiming - Hopkins is lying.. or Frank Warren fabricated an interview with maxboxing, to leak to the press, just like Jay Larkin fabricated a meeting between all involved discussing the possibility of a Calzaghe-Hopkins fight? That's it, right?

    Is the BBC good enough for you? Here's the story again with the Hopkins lies.. Or is it Warrens fabricated maxboxing interview
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/low/wales/1991289.stm

    This is from Thomas Hauser. This article refers to Hopkins scuppering a $10.5m three-fight deal with Showtime that included a fight with Calzaghe.
    http://www.secondsout.com/USA/colhau...cs=208&cs=8636

    Ditto this link
    http://www.puertorico-herald.org/iss...at0635-en.html

    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing