Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: You thought BoxRec was bad? See these

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    SigmaMu Guest

    Default You thought BoxRec was bad? See these


    Just an example of their records.

    http://www.britishboxing.net/boxers_...ly-Pavlik.html



    Some profiles are updated but this is pathetic.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3462
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: You thought BoxRec was bad? See these

    Yeah well that Pavlik Kid is 2-0 now but lets see what happens when he gets in with a ranked fighter .....

    Hidden Content IN CASE THEY ALL FORGOT WHAT REAL HEAVYWEIGHT POWER WAS!!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,244
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1174
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: You thought BoxRec was bad? See these

    cc to both for the laugh
    Francisco "The Wizard" Palacios
    WBA Fedelatin Champ -WBC #1 Contender
    21-1* (13 K.O.s) Cruiserweight

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    11,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: You thought BoxRec was bad? See these

    Hidden Content

    Marching Towards the Abyss...............

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3462
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: You thought BoxRec was bad? See these

    Quote Originally Posted by Bx730NY
    cc to both for the laugh

    CC#137 back to ya...

    Hidden Content IN CASE THEY ALL FORGOT WHAT REAL HEAVYWEIGHT POWER WAS!!!

  6. #6
    SigmaMu Guest

    Default Re: You thought BoxRec was bad? See these

    Never the less, I found this very interesting news:

    http://www.britishboxing.net/jobs.html

    Maybe some of you Brits might want to take advantage of their offer.

    Britishboxing.net always welcomes new writers.

    You can tailor your commitment depending on how much you want to do really. It's unpaid (for all of us) but rewarding and a potential foot in to further writing, if you are that way inclined. Our focus, as the website name betrays, is boxing involving British fighters. We try to cover as many promotions as we can by having someone at ringside (via a free press pass) who will send in results and file a report asap, to get us ahead of the competition. But you can also make a valuable contribution without ever having to leave your house, if that's what you want!

    My main concern is to improve and maintain the integrity of the writing on the site. However, if you are not a particularly confident writer but still are keen to contribute, don’t worry. I will give you plenty of helpful advice and help tidy things up.

    We would welcome your input on anything you like related to British boxing - previews, fight reports, news snippets, opinion pieces, features...you would have the freedom to control your own input. Before you kick off doing anything (e.g. a preview for a big fight), you might want to check with me to see if anyone else is on the case.

    We have press credentials with every major promoter in Britain and are undoubtedly the leading British website for domestic fight reports. If you would like to be a part of this, it is an option open to you (after we have a look at your writing, naturally!).

    Get back to me
    http://www.britishboxing.net/?page=c...stination=jobs
    whenever you are ready with any suggestions of potential pieces you fancy doing/questions about the site and we'll take it from there.

    Ian McNeilly
    http://www.britishboxing.net/team-me...-McNeilly.html
    News Editor
    www.BritishBoxing.net

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    south of england near brighton
    Posts
    1,429
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1061
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: You thought BoxRec was bad? See these

    i wrote one article for them b4 moving over to saddos, decent bunch of people

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    98
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: You thought BoxRec was bad? See these

    British boxing is updated by the same guys as boxrec,

    The reason why Pavlik only has two bouts is they onyl compile the records of British fighters - foreign fighters usually only appear when they are on the same bill as a british fighter or fight a british opponent.

    They are not trying to provide a comprehensive service, just cover the british boxers,

    its got a good newsflow as well. they are normally first with british news due to a range of contacts - Frank Maloney writes for them once in a while,

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5018
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: You thought BoxRec was bad? See these

    Quote Originally Posted by Floyd_Fears_Cotto

    Just an example of their records.

    http://www.britishboxing.net/boxers_...ly-Pavlik.html



    Some profiles are updated but this is pathetic.
    Maybe their a sub-division of BoxRec?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing