Thanks for a great post. I agree and disagree.

Yes, he was the toughest at 140, but he was also the best. Look at his record... ONE LOSS after a 2.5 year layoff, and he beat EVERY TOP PERSON at 140. Leonard did his best to win at JuWelt without fighting Pryor (just like Mayweather won a belt at 140 without fighting Cotto or Hatton).

I don't think he gets the credit he deserves... In 40 fights, one loss. In 40 fights only 4 decisions, and two of those came in his first ten fights. This means he KO'd all but three of the people he fought in his prime and after!!!

Name someone else who can claim this. Bad hands or not, PBF was never knocking people dead like Pryor--at any weight class.

If he was not the best boxer at 140, then who was?