Why ?? both men were at there best and Kessler was clearly beaten by at least 4 or 3 rounds. I don't really see why Calzaghe has to fight Kessler again.Originally Posted by eagle
Why ?? both men were at there best and Kessler was clearly beaten by at least 4 or 3 rounds. I don't really see why Calzaghe has to fight Kessler again.Originally Posted by eagle
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks