Quote Originally Posted by Ice Cold Boxing
Quote Originally Posted by El Gamo
Well as Mick and I said,we both had the fight for Tony but you can see what they are saying. Williams threw more,Margarito's punches were harder and cleaner.I don't really see why they would be biased. Kevin Iole,who had Tony winning,is a respected journalist who has probably been writing longer than you've been born and is a Margarito critic,yet he had Tony winning. I'm not saying it was correct but I wouldn't say it was "biased". What reason would he have to be biased?That's not a logical argument.
So your telling me 116-112 is not a biased scorecard ?? your telling me my argument is not logical argument then tell me where is the logic behind his scoring ?? 8 rounds to 4 for Margarito ?? i thought basically everyone had Williams winning the first 5 rounds at least and lets just say for arguments sake that Williams won first 4 rounds instead of 5 yes ?? then still how can he come up with that scoring ?? when Williams for certain won 12th round that would still mean Williams won 5 rounds, its virtually impossible not to have Williams winning more than 4 rounds without biased scoring. I thought the fight was pretty close going into 12th but like i said earlier Williams won the 12th round erasing any doubt in most peoples eyes including mine.

And you say this writer has been writing longer than i've been born which is probably true. But his knowledge for his age certainly isn't showing with a ridiculous scorecard like that.
Read my post properly and then respond,as I've already given answers to your questions. I'm not excusing their scorecards but certainly a large majority of ringside scorers had the fight for Tony.They saw the impact of his blows and the bodywork,I still disagree with them though.