Quote Originally Posted by El Gamo
Your questions:

So your telling me 116-112 is not a biased scorecard ?? your telling me my argument is not logical argument then tell me where is the logic behind his scoring ?? 8 rounds to 4 for Margarito ??

My answers:

Quote Originally Posted by El Gamo
Well as Mick and I said,we both had the fight for Tony but you can see what they are saying. Williams threw more,Margarito's punches were harder and cleaner.I don't really see why they would be biased. Kevin Iole,who had Tony winning,is a respected journalist who has probably been writing longer than you've been born and is a Margarito critic,yet he had Tony winning. I'm not saying it was correct but I wouldn't say it was "biased". What reason would he have to be biased?That's not a logical argument.
I hope this helps.


My answer back is that nearly everyone who watched the fight gave Williams the 1st 5 rounds. Its virtually impossible to have Williams not winning more than 4 rounds hence he was either biased or he didn't watch the fight properly, because not 1 single person on this forum had that scorecard or anywhere near it. I also told you that these so called *Respected Journalists* have had wacky scorecards in the past and i gave you the examples earlier. I couldn't really careless what scorecard he had because you and i and everyone on this forum knows Margarito no way on this earth won 8 rounds to 4. You also said you don't agree with it so i don't really understand the point your trying to make ??