One Belt-ONe Champion

[BigLuke]

i like what the ring is trying to do but at the end of the day it's just another belt adding to the confusion.

I person think boxing on free tv would be good. when i say free tv i don't mean HBO or any other cable network. Its gotta come on a channel like NBC ABC CBS FOX or CW.

Public tv would be great for boxing. Paperviews have made many uninterested. All I'm saying is , is that changes are gonna have to be made, because boxing has been on a steady decline, as far as interest. Pretty soon its gotta hit the bottom. I think having one belt would also help to fix the problem.

[Pugilistic]

having one belt, one champion will never happen

[The Fightfan]

I know I will gain alot off hatred towards this comment but,Me for one I like having 4 different belt holder not 14 different for each division.It gives them something to fight for a chance at gaining all the belts in a box-off.I mean think about it aren't some of you excited about the Klitschko and Ibragimov fight simply do to one of those guys having two belts closer to being a unified champ when they win.I like 4 belts not 14 that's all I saying.

[Big_Deuce]

it would be nice to have 1 belt...
But, i don't really need some organization to tell me whos the best in that division.

[SigmaMu]

Two belts max.

One for the king and the other for the prince.

The prince gets a shot at the kings title but no man can keep two belts. If the prince beats the king, he takes the kings belt and vacates the belt of the prince. If the prince loses, he also loses the belt but not to the king. He loses the belt so others can fight for it.



The problem with this sport, is they have no real order of who should fight who. No real schedule like in baseball or football. Some people get ducked while others get undeserving shots. Boxing tournaments with eliminators would be great for the sport. Each fighter pays a small fee or large fee depending on who they are.