Which trilogy was better?

[Kel]

Barrerra vs Morales for me. The first fight was legendary in itself

[CutMeMick]

I'm thinking this has something to do with me being there for 2 out of the 3 fights......

But I voted Marquez vs. Vasquez.

[Taeth]

I have to say Barrera-Morrales... they are more skilled, they fought IMO with more fury, and they fought better. I think Marquez-Vazquez had that special edge that you get seeing Cotto fight in that both fighters carry that certain sense of vulnerability because they had been stopped in the past before, however Marquez isn't as good as his bro who is IMO on the same plane as Morrales and Barrera.

[:::PSL:::]

I have to say Barrera-Morrales... they are more skilled, they fought IMO with more fury, and they fought better. I think Marquez-Vazquez had that special edge that you get seeing Cotto fight in that both fighters carry that certain sense of vulnerability because they had been stopped in the past before, however Marquez isn't as good as his bro who is IMO on the same plane as Morrales and Barrera.

Agreed. IMO, at 122-126, both Barrera and Morales would beat Vazquez and Marquez. MAB & EM were the top dogs.

[Violent Demise]

I liked them both