Vazquez-Marquez III better than Castillo-Corrales?

[bzkfn]

Close but my answer is no. Honestly, I thought Castillo-Corrales was gunna end about 5 or 6 times before it did and when it did I was shocked over what happened. It is still hands down the single greatest fight I yhave ever seen and when someone asks me why I like boxing, I did the tape out and show them that fight. They then understand.

[donnydarkoIRL]

As a boxing match Vasquez-Marquez was better.

As a violent slugfest Castillo Corrales may have been better.

But I'd take Vasquez and Rafael anyday.

[OumaFan]

No I don't think so, as good as it was its still a clear notch below Castillo-Corrales IMO. Maybe the best trilogy of all time but not the best fight I don't think, great fight though. And the skill level for Castillo-Corrales can be underrated, the infighting was so crisp. Neither guy that hard to hit but then again Marquez and Vasquez aren't defensive geniuses either.

[mickeyluvsu]

I believe that they are both up there but to pick one.........wow!
i think it's impossible both fights had there caliber and just two different styles on how they approached each other.
Now knowing that if Castillo would have made weight for the second and third then maybe it would have been different but i believe that from the trilogy between Vasquez and Marquez and those three aginast just one outstanding match is undebateable.

I'll leave the rest for you to decide.............PEACE!!!!!!!