I Think Theres A Slight Chance Peter May Get Ktfo

[El Kabong]

The mere fact that you're even engaging in an argument about the career accomplishments of Chandalier Klitchko versus a D LEVEL FIGHTER LIKE PETER is in itself hysterical

....I think you trying to stick up for Sam Peter is amusing, after calling him a D level fighter you explain how he could beat any other title holder is amusing

[match]

....I think you trying to stick up for Sam Peter is amusing, after calling him a D level fighter you explain how he could beat any other title holder is amusing

Please point out where I say he would beat any other title holder, then come talk to me. Until then, I suggest you brush up on your reading skills

[El Kabong]

You keep implying that Sam Peter will beat Wladimir Klitschko

Klitchko grazed him about 30 times with that uppercut in the first fight. Unfortunately, it was Wlad who had to keep picking his sorry @ss up off the canvas throughout the fight

....and to my knowledge you haven't mentioned anyone else, although you said Sam Peter had "Awesome Power" which may hint that you believe he beats other top level heavyweights who may not posess the boxing skill to outbox him or fighters that are smaller than him and may not have had their chins tested yet.....like a Ruslan Chagaev.

[match]

Which may hint? Dude, I said any fighter with marginal skill has no excuse losing to him. Butterbean has awesome power. Does that 'hint' that he stands a chance against any of the top current heavyweights? How is saying someone who has power an implication that they will beat Wlad?

[El Kabong]

Hey you're the one who made it a point to discuss his knocking Wladimir down and his "Awesome Power and respectible chin"....you're arguing FOR Sam Peter, you just give yourself the out clause with this "marginal skills"bullcrap which is vague termanology so you can be correct either way

[match]

Hey you're the one who made it a point to discuss his knocking Wladimir down and his "Awesome Power and respectible chin"....you're arguing FOR Sam Peter, you just give yourself the out clause with this "marginal skills"bullcrap which is vague termanology so you can be correct either way

When's the last time you saw someone deck another fighter THREE TIMES and not only lose, but lose BY A SIGNIFICANT MARGIN? Exactly how am I arguing FOR Sam Peter when I BEGAN THIS WHOLE ARGUMENT by pointing out he will ALWAYS lose to skilled fighters? How is that giving myself an 'out?' And what part of 'marginal skills' is vague to you

[match]

That's what I thought

Goodbye!

[El Kabong]

When's the last time you saw someone deck another fighter THREE TIMES and not only lose, but lose BY A SIGNIFICANT MARGIN? Exactly how am I arguing FOR Sam Peter when I BEGAN THIS WHOLE ARGUMENT by pointing out he will ALWAYS lose to skilled fighters? How is that giving myself an 'out?' And what part of 'marginal skills' is vague to you

Well does James Toney have "Marginal skills"? Was James Toney not a "skilled fighter"

[match]

James Toney 'HAD' exceptional skills. Unfortunately, Lyle, James Toney was entering close to his 80TH PROFESSIONAL FIGHT (not to mention coming off of getting schooled by Hasim Rahman of all people.)

[El Kabong]

James Toney 'HAD' exceptional skills. Unfortunately, Lyle, James Toney was entering close to his 80TH PROFESSIONAL FIGHT (not to mention coming off of getting schooled by Hasim Rahman of all people.)

.....I don't think Jameel McCline has 'marginal skills' (I don't think he's got ANY skill).....and if he did he didn't have enough (in my mind) to where he would knock Sam Peter down 3 times.