Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Worse decision makers in boxing history

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1309
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    I can't criticize Tito for taking a risk and moving up to 160 to try to win the middleweight title. Tito wanted to be an all-time great, and all-time greats take challenges and fight the best. I give him credit for moving up to 160, destroying Joppy, and fighting Hopkins.

    However, I do wish Tito had kept fighting instead of retiring. There's no shame in losing to Hopkins, who's an all-time great middleweight and who fought the fight of his life that night. Tito had nothing to be ashamed of, he should have moved back to 154 and kept fighting, he could've become a champ there again quickly.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1346
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Kelly Pavlik





    He's helping campaign for Hillary What is he thinking, maybe he's punch drunk already?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,394
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1272
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea View Post
    I can't criticize Tito for taking a risk and moving up to 160 to try to win the middleweight title. Tito wanted to be an all-time great, and all-time greats take challenges and fight the best. I give him credit for moving up to 160, destroying Joppy, and fighting Hopkins.

    However, I do wish Tito had kept fighting instead of retiring. There's no shame in losing to Hopkins, who's an all-time great middleweight and who fought the fight of his life that night. Tito had nothing to be ashamed of, he should have moved back to 154 and kept fighting, he could've become a champ there again quickly.
    Hi SweetPea you are righ, but i understand to Bookeeper and Lyle too , the point is if Tito loss with Hopkins and Winky why he returned back if he knew that he didnt have anything to get in that Div.of 160 pnd. , so then he came back with Jones Jr. to fight in SMW Div. and make the ridicolus for spot all the glory that he reached, we know that all of these is about Money , but his History ? So is true Tito had nothing to be ashamed , but his fans lose his CREDIBILITY IN HIM....... thats my point of view.......SweetPea

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    7,495
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2727
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Watching him against Jones in my eyes his stock went up. For the first time I was impressed.
    Pain lasts a only a minute, but the memory will last forever....

    boxingbournemouth - Cornelius Carrs private boxing tuition and personal fitness training

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2301
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrap View Post
    Watching him against Jones in my eyes his stock went up. For the first time I was impressed.
    Trinidad?!
    091

  6. #6
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Roy fighting Tarver a second time....all Tarver wanted to do was to fight Roy until he beat him and Roy gave him the opportunity! Roy could have KO'd Tarver in the first fight and Tarver would have still called for a rematch.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    7,495
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2727
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Yes, Trinadad
    Pain lasts a only a minute, but the memory will last forever....

    boxingbournemouth - Cornelius Carrs private boxing tuition and personal fitness training

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2301
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrap View Post
    Yes, Trinadad
    I'm just surprised that was the first time he impressed you.
    091

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 50
    Last Post: 06-16-2007, 06:10 AM
  2. More Info on Howard Cosell's decision to leave boxing?
    By Beanflicker in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-12-2007, 12:15 AM
  3. Boxing History
    By vickstar in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-04-2006, 05:13 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-04-2006, 09:21 PM
  5. Kessler vs. the money makers
    By azumir in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-23-2006, 07:53 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing