Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Is the linear championship as prestigious as the alphabets?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 47

Thread: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    Of course it is LENNOX LEWIS is still the Linear heavyweight champ.

    Because From when Patterson beat Moore the true champ is the man who beat the man.

    The reason LENNOX LEWIS boxed Shannon Briggs was not because Briggs held the WBU title. It was because by beating Foreman Briggs was the linear champ.

    And no matter how little anyone rates Briggs in the history of boxing for a very short time he held the legitimate heavyweight championship of the world.
    The problem is Seanie he didn't beat Foreman, Foreman was robbed and Foreman was what 47 year's old ??

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    977
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Well when it comes to the Lineal Title you have to go to the old motto that sais the title does not make the champion but the champion makes the title.

    The best example of this is when Roy Jones ruled the 175lb division he was never the linear champion. But he was without a doubt THE MAN at that division.

    So the answer is: It depends on who is the linear champion.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    721
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan View Post
    Well when it comes to the Lineal Title you have to go to the old motto that sais the title does not make the champion but the champion makes the title.

    The best example of this is when Roy Jones ruled the 175lb division he was never the linear champion. But he was without a doubt THE MAN at that division.

    So the answer is: It depends on who is the linear champion.

    What a crock of dogs pooh.

    Jones inherited Michazelski titles.

    He was scared to box outside America.

    Michazelski has more claim to being the linear champ than Jones ever had.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1401
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    What a crock of dogs pooh.

    Jones inherited Michazelski titles.

    He was scared to box outside America.

    Michazelski has more claim to being the linear champ than Jones ever had.
    Hmmmm

    Are you sure?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    977
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    What a crock of dogs pooh.

    Jones inherited Michazelski titles.

    He was scared to box outside America.

    Michazelski has more claim to being the linear champ than Jones ever had.

    Explain to me which part of my post is a crock of dogs pooh....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    721
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan View Post
    Explain to me which part of my post is a crock of dogs pooh....


    Jones won titles Michazkeski was forced to give up.

    He refused to box Michazlski cos he was scared.

    You saying Jones deserves to be liner champ is a massive crock of dogs pooh.

    He doesnt deserve it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    977
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    Jones won titles Michazkeski was forced to give up.

    He refused to box Michazlski cos he was scared.

    You saying Jones deserves to be liner champ is a massive crock of dogs pooh.

    He doesnt deserve it.

    Ummm... NO I never said that. I said that he was not the Linear Champion. IMO he should not be considered the linear champion because he never beat Darious who was deservatly so, the the linear champion.

    All I'm saying is that in that case the belts held more weight than the linear title. I respect Darious but I think it is safe to say that Jones was the #1 175lber of his time.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2276
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    What a crock of dogs pooh.

    Jones inherited Michazelski titles.

    He was scared to box outside America.

    Michazelski has more claim to being the linear champ than Jones ever had.
    Incorrect
    091

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1284
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    The Ring Magazine belts are the ONLY ones that matter.

    I couldn't even tell you who owns the WBC, WBA, IBF in any of the divisions, because they're completely worthless.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Ricky Hatton may not hold any major title but he is considered the true champion at light welterweight.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1450
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    ring magazine should not be considered an actual championship more an accurate evaluation of divisional rankings.

    Nadal won wimbledon but he is still 2nd in the world
    Italy won the world cup but theyre not number 1 in the fifa rankings

    Rankings are an estimation of who exactly is the best, but a championship it isnt!!
    one dangerous horrible bloke

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    a local pub near you.
    Posts
    7,652
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2842
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Ricky Hatton may not hold any major title but he is considered the true champion at light welterweight.

    and the greatest boxer EVER. Knocked out a prime castillo with the best body shot EVER.
    "If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LEEDS
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1148
    Cool Clicks

    Talking Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    This must have been the quickest poll answer Ive ever given ... linear every day of the week for me ...

    Hidden Content
    A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea View Post
    The Ring Magazine belts are the ONLY ones that matter.

    I couldn't even tell you who owns the WBC, WBA, IBF in any of the divisions, because they're completely worthless.
    I'm with you bro, the alphabets don't exist to me!

    As for Jones/ Dariusz me & Mick had a long debate awhile back. Mick said cause Hill & Maske fought that created a linear champ but I disagreed because Jones had fought in the division before that fight occurred so Hill & Maske weren't the 2 best fighters in the division. From there Jones put all 3 belts together something Dariusz didn't (even if he was stripped unfairly he didn't get Jones part) so in my eyes Jones has more claim to the LH linear title than Dariusz.
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,047
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5122
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    The alphabet titles have been diluted to the point of being Irrelevant.Love the Rings mind set.They are cutting teeth also with the "Technical" point of view.Do any of us actually believe Casamayor "beat" Santa-Cruz ? Confounded record books lol. The networks do not need the Championship banner any more to push a fight.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. National Championship Game
    By OumaFan in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-08-2008, 06:27 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-07-2007, 02:09 PM
  3. Midget Breakdancing Championship!!!
    By CountryBoy in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-01-2007, 07:34 PM
  4. Tribute to the linear heavyweight champs
    By The Rookie Fan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 03-21-2007, 04:38 AM
  5. The Heavyweight Championship....
    By DaxxKahn in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-14-2007, 08:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing