
Originally Posted by
GermanHitman
This is why boxing as a sport is failing. All the crap that is formulated. Why would Nate be on Steroids? Let's see.. because this is the biggest fight of his life so he wanted to get in trouble and blow it all and that's how he wants to be remembered? Of course not!! Nate was not on steroids... he was on a mission. This guy works hard to get what he has and appreciates life and his opportunities.. he knows he's not getting younger and seized his opportunity. Now sore losers are gonna come running and cry foul because the so-called "underdog" came in more focused and executed a better game plan beating the "then Champion" at his own game. You can't do that.. These allegations are a black eye to the sport and also to a man that worked his ass off to pull off an upset and make the most of his big moment. Why can't people understand that some people don't know what they have when they have it .. so they lose focus and belts; while others know that these chances are few and far between they appreciate the opportunity and work feverishly to accomplish the goal because they want that belt. they want a better life.. THEIR MORE HUNGRY!!! This is why they fight.. nobody is promised a win. If that was the case we wouldn't be watching and people wouldn't be betting.
Why would Barry Bonds be on steriods? How bout the olympic sprinters? Performance enhancing drugs are rampant in professional sports, people passing piss tests doesn't always mean they didn't use steriods, just that they got off with enough time to pass the piss test. I am not saying that the reason Nate won is steroids, but not having a test means the possibility wasn't ruled out.
People use steroids to "peak" prior to their performances. Sprinters are actually the most accomplished in cycling them, it's very rampant. Why would boxing be any different? If it's rampant in baseball, football, sprinting and track and field, why not boxing? Actually the stakes are higher in boxing than football and baseball so why not

?
Bookmarks